Good evening, I'm John Yang.

Whatever optimism there may have been that lawmakers would reach a deal this weekend to end the longest government shutdown on record has faded as Senate Democrats demand a one-year extension of Affordable Care Act insurance premium subsidies.

President Trump floated an idea of his own.

Terminate per dollar spent the worst health care anywhere in the world, Obamacare.

That's clearly a non-starter for Democrats.

The Senate held its first Saturday session since the 39-day shutdown began, but no votes were scheduled.

Tonight, we're following two of the most widespread effects felt by Americans, air travel and nutrition benefits.

On the second day of reduced flights at 40 airports, the aviation data company Serium said nearly 4% of flights were cancelled and about 2 and a.5% have been cancelled for tomorrow.

Randy Babbot was FAA administrator in the Obama administration.

Mr.

Mr.

Bab, is this working?

Are reduced flights uh reducing delays?

No.

Uh they're reducing the flights for the the primary purpose and a good purpose of making the system safe.

They're suffering a loss of controllers at the various stations.

They're not interchangeable.

And to ensure the system operates safely, you just have to reduce traffic down to the level of the number of controllers you can put up.

Is this sustainable?

No, it's it's actually going to continue to accelerate in the wrong direction.

And the longer we ask people to work without a paycheck.

The longer we ask people to work 10, 12, 14 hour shifts, you know, you just can't sustain that.

People are calling in sick.

They're tired.

It's an intense job.

The controllers are well trained and there's a lot of stress in that job and you can't keep doing it.

You know, we have the staffing levels where they were for a good reason and uh we're not achieving that level of of controllers uh you know, on on site and and on their stations.

I want to go back to the point you pointed made about controllers not being interchangeable.

It's not that you can sort of see how many controllers are working nationwide.

It depends on each airport, each air traffic control center.

Oh, absolutely.

The there's a big difference between being an in route controller or a tower controller or an approach control uh person.

Those are different jobs and they're not interchangeable.

someone who's working in route cannot go the next morning uh and be in the Richmond Tower.

You know, it takes months of training to make those transitions.

And controllers are you talking about how they're they're sort of being stressed now.

No pay, many of them having to uh call out to work other jobs to get pay.

They were already stressed.

Even before this began, the system was already stressed, wasn't it?

Yes, we're still recovering postcoid.

you know, they they let like a lot of companies did.

They let people go uh because the system was only operating at 30% at the at the peak of COVID, but you don't just call them back.

Uh a lot of them early retired.

And second, if you have to hire them, it takes several years to train a controller to be uh fully up to speed and be able to go into the different control positions.

Former FAA administrator Randy Babbot, thank you very much.

Oh, thank you.

Good luck.

And now the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or SNAP, which provides payments to 40 million low-income Americans.

Last night, the Supreme Court blocked for the time being a judge's order that the administration pay full SNAP benefits for November.

Amy How of Scotas Blog is PBS News Supreme Court analyst.

Amy, so explain, put it simply, what did the Supreme Court do last night?

So, I'm not sure there's a way to put it simply, but I'll try.

Um, last night, the Trump administration came to the Supreme Court around 6:45 asking the justices to pause a ruling by a federal judge in Rhode Island that would have required the Trump administration to fully fund the SNAP program for the month of November.

The US Solicitor General D. John Sauer, he's the government's top lawyer in the Supreme Court, said, "Yes, this is a crisis, but it's a crisis that only Congress can fix."

And he asked the justices to act quickly to issue what's known as an administrative stay, which essentially would put the judges ruling on on hold to give the justices time to rule on the government's request by 9:30 last night.

And the government came to the Supreme Court because it had made a similar request from the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, which is based in Boston and hears appeals from Rhode Island.

And that court, the first circuit, declined to issue the administrative stay, but said, "We will act quickly on your request to put the ruling on hold while you appeal."

Shortly before 9:30, at 9:17 last night, Justice Katanji Brown Jackson issued that administrative stay.

Justice Jackson is what's known as the circuit justice for the First Circuit, which means that all of the emergency requests go initially to her.

And it's not unusual for the circuit justice to issue these kinds of administrative stays.

And she said, "The reason I'm issuing this stay now is because we expect the first circuit to act quickly."

And so she put the federal judge's ruling on hold for 48 hours after the first circuit acts.

We don't know exactly when that could be when that's going to be, but it could be this weekend.

It could be on Monday.

But it means that once the first circuit does act, then the ruling will only be on hold for 48 more hours.

So this is going to move really quickly, I think.

But the the Reader's Digest version of it, so to speak, is that at least for now, the requirement that the government fully fund the November SNAP program is on hold.

And this is, as you say, an administrative stay to give the court time.

It does it say anything about the Supreme Court's view of the the merits of the arguments on either side?

No, it really just says because we expect the first circuit to act quickly given the first circuit's representations that it is going to act quickly.

We're going to go ahead and and put this on hold for now.

Things were just moving very very fast and I think it was an effort to give the justices time to decide for the justices to act.

you know, they are certainly these days accustomed to getting requests on their emergency docket, but to try and act that quickly is really a very expedited decision.

PBS News Supreme Court analyst Amy How.

Thank you very much, Amy.

Thank you.